The article examines the formation of a teacher’s communicative tolerance as an important component of his ethical culture and professional development. This process is complex and continuous, as it is based on the active interaction of the individual with the professional environment, which significantly affects the effectiveness of pedagogical work. Communicative tolerance is the basis for professional self-development, self-education and self-realization of teachers. It is noted that the concept of “tolerance” remains ambiguously interpreted and is often equated with “tolerance” in scientific sources, originating from the Latin term toleranttia. Researchers also interpret the term “communicative tolerance” in different ways, describing it as a professional quality manifested in the pedagogical environment during interaction with people with whom specialists have to work directly. The importance of communicative tolerance as a necessary condition for the development of pedagogical ethics in professional activity is highlighted.

It is noted that tolerance affects the attitude towards other people, their psychological states, qualities and actions in the process of communicative interaction. Communicative tolerance covers the focus of consciousness on tolerant and conflict-free communication, as well as a benevolent type of interaction. This issue is especially relevant for teachers who, as carriers of cultural values, have the task of forming in their students the ability for effective interaction, empathy and respect. It was found that the teacher and students may have different values ​​and orientations in the field of interaction, which can lead to manifestations of communicative intolerance towards each other. As for the ethical aspect, it reflects the ethical norms that the teacher adheres to – being guided by a sense of duty or a habit of acting irresponsibly.

Emphasis is placed on the importance of developing communicative tolerance as an essential element in the training of specialists in the pedagogical field, which contributes to the creation of a positive sociocultural environment.

Key words: communicative tolerance, communicative competence, pedagogical ethics, professional activity, benevolence, interaction.

References

1. Bekh, I. D. (2018), “Component technology of the ascent of a growing personality to spiritual values”, Elementary school, No. 1, pp. 5–10.
2. Skok, A. G. (2005), “Communicative tolerance of a teacher of a higher educational institution”, Actual problems of psychology. Social psychology. Organizational psychology. Economic psychology,1, Part 15, pp. 113–117, Kostyuk Institute of Psychology, Kyiv.
3. Balakhtar, V. V. (2017), “Communicative competence as a component of the professionalism of a social work specialist”, Quality education in Ukraine: trends, problems, prospects : Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Chernivtsi, October 26–28), Chernivtsi national University, Chernivtsi.
4. Bessarab, N. A. (2020), Education of intercultural tolerance of younger schoolchildren in the educational process of primary school : PhD in Pedagogy, Kyiv.
5. Hryva, O. A. (2005), Socio-pedagogical foundations of the formation of tolerance in children and youth in the conditions of a multicultural environment : monograph, PARAPAN, Kyiv.
6. Galuzyak, V. M. (2012), “Tolerance in the structure of personal maturity of a teacher”, Scientific notes of Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after Mykhailo Kotsyubynskyi. Series: Pedagogy and psychology,38, pp. 388–394.
7. Kononko, O. L. (1998), “The problem of tolerance in the context of a personally oriented model of communication”, Pedagogy of tolerance, No. 1, pp. 5–10.
8. Kharchenko, L. P. (2012), “Communicative tolerance of a social pedagogue as a component of his ethical culture”, Pedagogical Scienсes, available at: http://www.rusnauka.com/5_SWMN_2012/Pedagogica/ 6_100892.doc.htm (аccessеd 07 July 2024).
9. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary (2002), Institute of Philosophy named after H. S. Skovorodа of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, chief еd. V. Shinkaruk, Abris, Kyiv.
10. Koshlan, I. G. (2009), “Specificity of communicative tolerance in students of representatives of different types of accentuations”, Science and Education, No. 8, pp. 68–71, Southern Scientific Center of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Odesa.